This weekend I attended a friend's wedding. It was absolutely lovely, a lot of fun, and the epitome of this blog--Mixed Race America. The bride is a white Mennonite from Canada. The groom is a Chinese American born to Taiwanese immigrant parents. The guests were a mix of various ethnicities and races--and a great number of them were "foreigners" -- Canadian family members and immigrants (many of whom have since become naturalized citizens) from China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Guatemala, Viet Nam, and Argentina. And there were multiracial guests: white-Chinese, white-Indian, Chinese-Guatemalan. One of the running jokes was that I was one of the few true "Americans"--one of the few guests born and raised in the United States.
I take for granted that weddings like this happen and that it was celebrated by guests who were African American, white, Canadian, Taiwanese, Asian American, Latino, etc...
So it was jarring to receive this blog comment on an older post I had written back in December 2009 when Philadelphia Cream Cheese put out its first (at least I believe it's their first) commercial featuring a visibly inter-racial couple (in this case a white man and a black woman):
"A close look at the Word of God proves he is against mingling"
White Christian Male under attach from both left and right"
race mixing is a sin . Not on a sin, its the sin that brings genocide to
one race or the other..currently in 50 years the white race will be a
minority in the USA
your comment caught up with you"
Monday, July 16, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I usually don't post comments, but, your blog came up on my news feed... I guess it was kismet.
The way I interpret that ACW's comments, I feel you shouldn't have any reason to feel anxious. It seems like he was saying that the White race will die off in 50 years and because of your thinking and relationship pattern, it's somehow your fault. In that respect, it has caught up to you.
Put comments like those aside. Everyone has an opinion... don't let it take up space in your brain.
Did you actually post his comment? I haven't had any bad comments on mine, but it's just one year old this month. I am much more open than you about who I am. I've seen so much that I refuse to be afraid of people -- you can't live being afraid like that. And, yes, he is afraid, too. I understand that, and I don't hate people for not recognizing my relationship and my children. I won't respond in kind.
Now I did get a comment last month, and my intuition told me it was baiting disguised as innocent questions. I responded and then wrote a whole post on it. My daughter said I went too far, but, honestly, I don't think I did and I don't have regrets. In fact I know I would respond the same way again if given the opportunity. For a while, one of my posts was getting a lot of traffic from a white fringe group. I was a little weirded out, but in the end I figured that it was okay. Those are some of the people who I hope to reach, right? Why preach to the choir? It's more comfortable but decidedly less effective.
I would not fuel the fire in this case, because you have to consider the source, and, you already know, you've handled it just fine with this post.
Dianne
http://aboutracewriter.blogspot.com/
Have you got his ISP? If yes, you can use that and the other information you have to make a report - even if it's no more than for your own records, it's good to keep documentation in case things escalate.
And, hooray interracial, intercultural weddings! Congrats to the happy families :) We recently married off my brother and, like your recent experience, I was so happy to find that the friends and chosen family he has cultivated in the far north (he lives in Alaska) are extraordinarily racially/ethnically diverse.
Hi everyone,
Thanks for your feedback/advice about how to handle ACW. I also had folks email me privately. I think I'll save the email (and lovepeaceohana, that's a good idea about the ISP) and wait and see. I don't think he's dangerous, but my instinct was to shine a little bit of light on him, not to give him airtime (because there's no reason to entertain someone whose opinions suggest he doesn't want dialogue, he wants antagonism) but in case the harassment escalates, I've made it public. I think I'm sensitive about this because of a nasty incident that happened when I wrote about the Duke Lacrosse case (lots of harassing email messages and one scary phone call).
Anyway, hope everyone is having a good day!
Post a Comment